Cubs Offseason Position Review: Shortstop

Published on

in

,

A look back at how each position performed in 2025, and a look ahead to 2026. These posts will compare the MLB rankings from 2024 with those produced in 2025, as well as individual statistics for all players who played the position in 2025.

Here are the other entries:
Catcher
First Base
Second Base

Positional Rankings: 2025 vs 2024

Stat20242025Change
WAR4.0 (10th)3.6 (15th)-0.4 (-5)
HR17 (t17th)25 (t5th)+8 (+12)
RBI69 (t16th)81 (t9th)+12(+7)
OPS.680 (20th).720 (17th)+.040 (+3)
wRC+92 (t20th)100 (t16th)+8 (+4)
DRS4 (t11th)7 (6th)+3 (+5)
OAA15 (t3rd)3 (t12)-12 (-9)

Values are total and then MLB rank in parentheses
wRC+ = Weighted Runs Created Plus
DRS = Defensive Runs Saved
OAA = Outs Above Average

As we know, these numbers are due, almost exclusively, to one player: Dansby Swanson. As Cubs fans complain about the lack of acquisition of big name free agents – rightly so in my option – Swanson is one of the exceptions. In the year when several big name shortstops were available: specifically Trea Turner, Carlos Correa and Xander Bogaerts, the Cubs went with Swanson on a 7-year, $177M dollar deal. So far, so good as here is the comparison of those players since 2023

#NameTeamGWARHRRBIOPSwRC+DRSAAV
1Trea TurnerPHI41714.762207.798118-22$27.3M
2Dansby SwansonCHC45512.462223.72110131$25.3M
3Xander BogaertsSDP4029.841155.738107-8$25.5M
4Carlos Correa2 Tms3658.545171.766113-16$31.2M

Turner has a higher WAR, due to his better offensive numbers, but Swanson is the best defensive player by far, and has a shorter contract (7 years versus 11 years) than Turner or Bogaerts. Correa has a 6-year deal, but a higher AAV, and has been much less valuable offensively and defensively. And Swanson has been more on the field more than the other three.

Going back to the MLB positional rankings, there are a couple of things that I’d like to focus on. First off, how is it possible that the Cubs saw the shortstop position drop in WAR in 2025 versus 2024, when all of the underlying numbers look better?

The key is looking at defensive WAR in addition to defensive runs saved. While the runs saved when up by three, the defensive WAR dropped by a significant amount (from 17.5 to 8.2). This may be driven by the Outs Above Average stat, which went from 15 to 3 (and 1 of those belong to Nico Hoerner). This is going to cause me to add that stat to these positional rankings.

The other interesting thing is that shortstops in MLB generally have much better numbers than players at second base. Here is the averages for some of the stats for shortstops versus second basemen per team:

PositionPAHRRBIOPSwRC+
2B66114.864.1,68292.9
SS66819.071.3.723103.0

So, while the numbers for Dansby Swanson and Nico Hoerner, in terms of OPS and wRC+ are similar, Hoerner looks better when compared to the rest of the league.

Individual Stats as a shortstop

NameGWARHRRBIOPSwRC+DRSOAA
Dansby Swanson1593.32477.7179972
Nico Hoerner60.202.73310601
Gage Workman20.1021.50031600
Vidal Bruján20.000.000-10000
Nicky Lopez20.000.000-10000

These numbers are almost identical to the number above, as Swanson played almost every game. Shockingly, Gage Workman had 2 RBIs as a shortstop and a 1.500 OPS. HIs numbers at third, as we will go over in a separate post, were not as good.

For Swanson, one of the key criticisms was his inability to hit with runners on or runners in scoring position. Here is the same chart I used to show how great Nico Hoerner was last season with runners in scoring position. Swanson falls to the bottom of the list, with a .204 batting average and .634 OPS.

NamePAAVGRBIK%OPS
Nico Hoerner172.3715110.5%.881
Seiya Suzuki180.3117620.6%.997
Michael Busch141.2925620.6%.891
Ian Happ170.2715820.6%.804
Kyle Tucker137.2675012.4%.865
Pete Crow-Armstrong176.2486925.6%.792
Carson Kelly134.2463818.7%.749
Dansby Swanson174.2045128.7%.634

Here is a comparison of Swansons numbers in the different situation:

SituationPAHHRRBIAVGOPSwRC+
Bases Empty374931717.266.764113
Men on Base27151760.213.64880
Men In Scoring17431451.204.63474

I wanted to go back a few years to see if this as always been an issue for Swanson

SeasonTmAVG
Bases Empty
OPS
Bases Empty
AVG
Runners On
OPS
Runners On
2016ATL.338.903.259.683
2017ATL.226.602.238.676
2018ATL.207.584.285.863
2019ATL.282.779.209.707
2020ATL.267.776.284.852
2021ATL.245.735.253.794
2022ATL.256.716.307.865
2023CHC.244.719.245.774
2024CHC.228.654.260.768
2025CHC.266.764.213.648
Career2 teams.248.707.254.765

So, for his career, Swanson is actually better with runners on base than he is with the bases empty. 2025 appears to have been an outlier, similar to 2016 where he was much better with the bases empty or 2022 and 2024 where he was much better with runners on.

The other concern is how his defense will be affected by his age. The drop in Outs Above Average, which attempts to measure range, is troubling.

SeasonTeamDRSOAA
2016ATL31
2017ATL-4-5
2018ATL107
2019ATL-21
2020ATL96
2021ATL-53
2022ATL920
2023CHC1720
2024CHC717
2025CHC72
Career Avg2 teams5.17.2

His number is Atlanta prior to 2022 were not great, but then he had an amazing 3-year run. HIs defensive runs saved was the same in 2025 as they were in 2024, so hopefully, his positioning and arm will allow him to make up for a decrease in his range over the next few seasons.

2026 Outlook

Player2026 Contract
Dansby Swanson$28M in 2026

Basically the Cubs are set at shortstop for the next 4 seasons, with a player who is above average from both a defensive and power perspective. He will be 32 years old when the next season starts, so I suppose the biggest concern is how much regression will we see from Swanson over that 4 year span.

Nico Hoerner should be the primary backup in 2026, but it would be good for the Cubs to acquire a utility player who can play at shortstop.

There are no players in the upper minor leagues who would be though of as an heir apparent, with Cristian Hernandez as a potential long-term option in the long term.

One big questions for Swanson in 2026 i where he should hit in the batting order. He settled into the 8 spot (or 7th if McGuire was playing), which seems about right. He’s not a great on-base guy, and he strikes out a fair amount. If the Cubs decide to go with a younger player in the RF/DH spot, and keep Shaw at 3rd, there’s a chance he would sit at 7 on most days.

While Swanson is not the best shortstop in the league, he is providing the Cubs with good value for the long-term deal he signed in 2023.

6 responses to “Cubs Offseason Position Review: Shortstop”

  1. […] Here are the other entries:CatcherFirst BaseSecond BaseShortstop […]

    Like

  2. […] are the other entries:CatcherFirst BaseSecond BaseShortstopThird […]

    Like

  3. […] are the other entries:CatcherFirst BaseSecond BaseShortstopThird […]

    Like

  4. […] are the other entries:CatcherFirst BaseSecond BaseShortstopThird BaseOutfieldDesignated […]

    Like

  5. […] are the other entries:CatcherFirst BaseSecond BaseShortstopThird BaseOutfieldDesignated HitterStarting […]

    Like

  6. […] are links to all of the entries:CatcherFirst BaseSecond BaseShortstopThird BaseOutfieldDesignated HitterStarting PitcherRelief […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Cubs Offseason Position Review: Starting Pitcher – Cubs in 7 Cancel reply